CONNECTION BETWEEN US 2016 ELECTIONS, AND RUSSIAN GOVERNMENT: ILLEGAL PROCESS IN USA
The Senate shall have EXCLUSIVE RIGHT to judge all allegations of official liability. When it meets with this object, its members must take an oath or protest. When judging the President of the United States, he should preside over the Supreme Court. And no person shall be condemned if the vote of two thirds of the members present is not concurred. (Article ONE, Third Section, Sections 6 and 7. Constitution USA)
In recent months, news of a Russian connection was circulating, with the US presidential elections in 2016, and that in May of the two thousand and seventeen, the US Congress had appointed a "Special Attorney" in the person of citizen Mr Robert Mueller, to investigate "anything that arises and could arise directly related to this matter." Since then, everything had gone in apparent calm; but yesterday the international news network CNN, released a series of speculations about the activities and investigations that the special lawyer, who from now on I will refer simply as Mr, "M", is performing in the major despite the fact, the "news" leaked that a Grand Jury in Washington DC, approved the first charges, derived from the investigation of the special lawyer Mr.M, on a possible collusion between the presidential campaign of DT, and the Russian Government. It was also leaked that a judge ordered to keep the charges in custody until making the first arrests next Monday. The Wall Street Journal confirmed speculation by CNN.
If the contemplations of CNN are true, we are facing a political - legal spectrum that contains several elements that we must analyze:
1.) THE APPOINTMENT, position or designation that the Senate grants to citizen lawyer, Mr. Robert Mueller, to investigate CONNECTION RUSSIAN GOVERNMENT - PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS 2916 USA; goes in the opposite direction to the established in the Constitution USA, in the article ONE; Third Section, Sections 6 and 7. Since the powers of the Senate are EXCLUSIVE to judge all charges for OFFICIAL RESPONSIBILITIES. In fact, a respectable and honest citizen such as Mr "M", are not sufficient qualities to perform the representation of the US Senate, having not been elected in terms of the articles ONE, Third Section, Sections 1,2,3, of the US Constitution, like any Senator. What proceeded in the present case is that the Senate Commission in charge of investigating the Russian Government Connection - Elections USA 2016, will appoint a SENATOR ATTORNEY, that there are several in that legislative body, and this yes, appoint a team of lawyers to advise him , among whom Mr "M" could be, but never, this one, to be designated in the terms that was done, like "Special Investigating Attorney", this appointment, position, designation, is unconstitutional because from that moment it became a citizen INVESTED IN CONSTITUTIONAL POWERS equal to those held by a SENATOR USA, in an irregular manner and contrary to that established by the US Constitution in articles ONE, Third Section, Sections 1,2,3.
2.) Another IRREGULARITY that the "SPECIAL ATTORNEY Mr," "M", to investigate the connection Russian Government - Elections USA 2016, is given when said appointment or position, is granted BEFORE THE FACTS THAT ARE INVESTIGATED, because expressly prohibits Articles 1, Section Nine, Paragraph 3, of the Constitution of the United States, when in an imperative order:
"NO PROSCRIPTION DECREES OR EX POST FACTO LAWS WILL APPLY."
Thus we could continue with a long list of irregularities around the designation or position granted to Mr. "M", but we will only address THREE more, in order not to damage egos, in the following way:
3.) If we are all facing the singular case of the Russian Government Connection - USA 2016 Elections, then we all have to agree that Mr "M" would be investigating respectable US citizens, including Mr. Donald Trump, prove otherwise) WHO DID NOT HAVE PUBLIC CHARGES at the time of the USA 2016 Presidential Campaign, and if we all agree on the above, then the SENATE DOES NOT HAVE CONSTITUTIONAL POWERS TO INTERVENE in the Russian Government Connection - 2016 Presidential Campaign , for several reasons, but the forceful and principal we express in the prologue of this note:
"The Senate shall have the EXCLUSIVE RIGHT to judge all charges for OFFICIAL RESPONSIBILITIES."
And in this, NO CITIZENS ARE INCLUDED, that is, speaking of exclusive right in any language that is established, is understood as EXCLUSIVE LAW, and, no one else can and should not be judged on accusations of Official Responsibilities. Even after the election has been classified as legal, granting and recognizing as the winner today, President Donald Trump, most of the contributors who intervened in his presidential campaign, remain respectable citizens of the United States, until proven otherwise and therefore , the US Senate does not have legal powers on its own, or by interposite person, to intervene and disturb them in their papers, property and their persons, because the US Senate can only judge on the accusations by Official Responsibilities (Article ONE, Third Section, Section 6 and 7. Constitution USA).
4.) If we talk about the Russian government connection - USA 2016 presidential campaign, there is no doubt that we are all talking, primarily about the NO LEGALITY of the 2016 presidential elections, and if we all talk about the NOT legality of the last electoral process, then we have what to ask
WHO QUALIFIED THE LEGALITY OF THE PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS USA 2016?
It is healthy to answer this question to end once and for all with the speculations of all kinds and the answer is, the CHAMBERS each qualified the LEGALITY OF THE PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS 20216, both that of REPRESENTATIVES, and the CAMERA OF SENATORS USA, legal presidential election 2016, where President Donald Trump was won in a transparent and unobjectionable manner for both chambers, as stated in their respective diaries of debates.
5.) In a transparent and unquestionable process each House qualified the elections, the reports on scrutiny and the legal capacity of their respective members. The transparency goes to each House to elaborate its internal regulations, to punish its members when they are unduly driven and to expel them from their bosom with the assent of the two thirds. In the event of a dispute over the transparency of the work, each Chamber shall keep a journal of its sessions and shall publish it from time to time, except for those parties which, in its opinion, require reservation, and affirmative and negative votes of its members with respect to any question will be recorded in the newspaper, at the request of the fifth of those present. All this process, supported in what establishes the article ONE, Fifth Section, Aparatados 1,2, and 3, of the Constitution USA.
6.) The above means that if the US SENATE USA, speaks and questions the CONNECTION RUSSIAN GOVERNMENT - ELECTIONS USA 2016 CAMPAIGN, IS QUESTIONING THEIR OWN WORK, from the moment the presidential elections passed through their hands, examined them, scrutinized them and finally, it was absurd and incomprehensible that they questioned a legal process that not only examined one of the legislators of each House, but also that each and every member of the US Congress intervened separately and in their they acted with complete freedom of conscience and knowledge of the law, so that, later on, they themselves disqualify their own work, for the sake of what seems more like a political lynching, than an impartial investigation of the electoral process USA 2016.
So far the second hypothesis of the illegal process that follows against the imaginary CONNECTION RUSSIAN GOVERNMENT - PRESIDENTIAL CAMPAIGN USA 2016, I have to expose three other hypotheses to demonstrate again and again, the illegal process, so absurd that, the very Samuel Beckett would have liked to write.