jueves, 30 de octubre de 2014

 THAT MEANS A BOOK IN MEXICO?

A few years ago I was posed the dilemma of taxing Or not tax books on Mexico. Considering that people read here, tax books was and is a capital aberration.  
Today we no longer worry about that. Today we worry about whether we will be alive at the end of the day. However, the book is still not found a solution to save today convulsed Mexico. 

So reflection is still valid: That means a book in Mexico?

  When you hear that the book is intended to tax the VAT on new features, including food and medicine are two things one can think, that this is uninformed economists whose heritage of technical issues related to their profession is reduced. If you intend to tax the book is supposed to have in their hands a previous study to know everything about the book, which in the end is made ​​by people outside the books.  

Or is that such action obeys a sinister plan to promote collective ignorance and make this country a general world of workers, masons, craftsmen and technicians? and a very small of professionals and leaders to guide them.              
          
Obviously all walks of VAT to book, go against education in Mexico in all items. The excuses are many. The truth is that general education in Mexico is still a reflection of the old positivism, which believes in a pedagogy for the rapid formation of nations; machines that will produce and pursue a specialization.

Politics certainly wrong.
For Mexicans of the third millennium is denying them the tools for a fulfilling life and human culture. The educational pragmatism is always counterproductive specialist, technical ignorant or ignorant economist produces less and produces evil, because he thinks less and think wrong.

It is said there that Germany produces excellent soaps because Kant wrote Critique of Pure Reason. It is proven as it is now reading this and you are breathing, that literary culture is essential in any profession. If people can not express in their language, thinking not know their language and therefore can neither be a good human being and a good citizen profesionista.
       Therefore it is a scandal the quality of education in Mexico and if we add the measures to be taken for Treasury resources such as VAT on tuition or tax collection at the sacrifice of hours reading millions of Mexicans then the outlook is bleak.

Before this crime committed without punishment, we attentive called guideline head Conaculta to take action and avoid the damn temptation to tax the book today we are on time and persuade legislators further taxation to tax books.

Because deleting the books is that the words, the language, the one that teaches you to think, to dream, to take responsibility, to rebel, to choose and if he can not be responsible for culture in this country and the Secretary of Education teach children to dream traveling with their language since elementary school, our country will continue to target the be a nation disintegrated half illiterate, half-baked people like today are millions of us.  

In France and England, the need to know the language well underlined. French children of eleven and twelve have read all his classic quote Moliere, Descartes and Pascal, recite poems of Eluard, Prévert and Desnos.

It is impossible to forget that every book is the son and the father of another book. From Homer to Joyce, everything is influence. But Shakespeare and Cervantes are the first to clearly establish the boundaries of any written literary work: the play within a play in Hamlet, reading Don Quixote, Don Quixote himself.

The surprise is that the Bible, one of the most important books and extraordinarily written ... would be taxed. This is a challenge to all power. It is a challenge to the desire to write. Arrogance and the need to communicate pleasure, since all reading, inevitably will result in writing. What would have happened in the time of Moses, if you could read little, he had been taxed empires and monarchies? If that which perished absurd is now a reality, prepare to soon pay tax on the air we breathe or the number of sunbeams settle on your skin.

No need to tell me, dear reader, to know that you as a citizen and voter reader is beyond being a guinea pig, or why be taken as a hostage to cynical privileged financial losers in a country where precisely the opportunities to talents not hanging from the trees.


If well taught literature in Mexico, our cities would be more beautiful, more humane and livable, because its inhabitants would require more and more. Our cities are a reflection of the inconsistency and mediocrity of the education provided in our country. Then add VAT to the book, practically putting education with the neck on the guillotine. Do you allow it?
  

CASE STANLEY COHEN (FINAL PART)

 THIRD HYPOTHESIS:

DIFFERENT WAYS TO DEMONSTRATE THAT THE IRS IS AN INDEPENDENT POWER, with unit itself to issue laws; other apparatus for punishment and punish tax evaders; another unit itself to replace a jury to accuse tax evaders alleged criminal and found that the four times out of legal procedure:

A). TAX ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE, 2006-54. "AUTHORITY". While a case is under the jurisdiction of the Division of Reviews, Simultaneous Appeals Procedure encourages taxpayers to seek help from a competent authority, and the participation of the department of Appeals. There we learned that the jurisdiction is in the tax administrative procedure 2006-54. 

Section 8 of Revenue Procedure 2006-54 specifies the circumstances under which the simultaneous appeals procedure / competent authority may request, and describes the role of the department of Appeals.

 B). INDEPENDENCE OF THE DEPARTMENT OF APPEALS. Another moment is found when the request of the department of Appeals, the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration (TIGTA, for its acronym in English) completed a thorough audit of independence department of Appeals. This audit examined all internal processes, quality control measures and the results of surveys on customer satisfaction. In addition, the TIGTA made ​​inquiries outside the department of Appeals and interviewed lots of tax professionals to learn more about their experiences with regard to the independence of the department of Appeals. All agreed the high level of independence of the Appeals Department.

C). INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE (IRS). This third time, obviously, when the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) issued laws on taxation, as the Act Restructuring and Reform of 1998 (RRA, for its acronym in English), which as we discussed is not the only law issued by them; which undoubtedly is illegal because the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) invades own unique features and US Congressional powers, according to the provisions of articles 1 and 18 of the Eighth Section of the Constitution US, which mandates that "Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes on incomes, from whatever source derived," however, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) ignore the above and the provisions of the Sixteenth Amendment, and does so with the deliberate purpose of marking the independence that holds the Appeals Department, under in recent years, concerns have been expressed about the structure and processes of the modern department of Appeals and if they met the standard independence that the Restructuring and Reform Act of 1998 (RRA, for its acronym in English) of the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) intended.

D). THE IRS IS A DECREE PROSCRIPCIÓN.- No doubt other time outside the legal process is found here, where the lawyer Stanley Cohen, the IRS as a direct tax NO proportional applies exclusively to the census ordered before practicing, being in fact the IRS, a decree of banishment pursued and punished with imprisonment accusing the lawyer Stanley Cohen in the absence of a jury, false tax evasion, trespassing unique features of the US Congress, causing very deep grievances to him and his family, to deprive him of his freedom and keep him in prison illegally for 18 months due to his political ideology to develop their work as a public defender to seek justice for the poor and discriminated people and the political system applied the IRS as decree proscription violates what estatuyen articles 2 and 3 of Section Nine of the Constitution of the US, from the time ordering that "no direct tax or capitation is laid, unless in Proportion to the Census or Enumeration herein before was ordered to practice "Consequently no State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States.; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty or property without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction within the protection of the laws, equal for all. [Fourteenth Amendment]

Under such conditions, the proposal or negotiation made ​​by the IRS attorney Stanley Cohen to plead guilty under pressure from the deprivation of liberty to the detriment of his family heritage to be 18 months out of work, subject to criminal prosecution, it is illegal and unconstitutional because "no one shall be held to answer for a crime punishable by death or otherwise infamous if a grand jury or indictment, (...) nor shall be compelled to testify against himself in any criminal case; nor be deprived of life, liberty or property without due process of law; "[Amendment Five]..

It is clear then that the charges against the attorney Stanley Cohen is illegal and unconstitutional to be shown that the IRS is an independent power of the judiciary, the executive and the legislature, using his power to pursue and punish the lawyer Stanley Cohen in a manner that is contrary to the provisions of the Constitution of the US and therefore are facing a SPURIOUS POWER, an illegal power whose determinations are illegal; consequently there is no crime to pursue tax against the attorney Stanley Cohen and all criminal proceedings against him is still NULL from the beginning, being insufficiently founded, and violate the amendments one, four, five, six, seven, eight, fourteen and sixteen, Bill of Rights of the Constitution of the US that have: Congress shall make no law (...) abridging the freedom of speech or of the press, or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for redress of grievances. [First Amendment].

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and arbitrary arrests, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, not rest on probable cause, are supported by Oath or affirmation and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized. [Amendment Four].

"No person shall be held to answer for a crime punishable by death or otherwise infamous if a grand jury or indictment, (...); nor shall be compelled to testify against himself in any criminal case; nor be deprived of life, liberty or property without due process of law; nor shall private property for public use without just compensation "be responsible. [Amendment Five].

"In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to be a speedy and public trial by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law; as well as to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation, to be confronted with the witnesses who testify against him, to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in that favor and enlist the help of a counsel for his defense. "[Amendment Six]

"The right to be aired before a jury trial in common law, where the value exceeds twenty dollars shall be preserved, (...)" [Amendment Seven]

  "Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines (...) be imposed" [Amendment Eight]

"All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty or property without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction within the protection of the law equal for all. "[Fourteenth Amendment]

"The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes on incomes, from whatever source derived, without apportionment among the several States, and without regard to any census or enumeration" [Amendment Sixteen].

Therefore be put to the accused Stanley Cohen released immediately and leave reserves its rights to timely asserting against the STATE (US) and repair the wrongs caused to the defendant and his family to keep him in prison for 18 months impairing their homestead and subject to its good reputation with the American public community.

lunes, 27 de octubre de 2014

CASE STANLEY COHEN
SCENARIO THREE UNCONSTITUTIONAL ON CRIMINAL PROCESS OF US GOVERNMENT PROCESSES - VS STANLEY COHEN ATTORNEY.

FIRST HYPOTHESIS: If the Tax Court follows a criminal case against Stanley Cohen in the absence of a grand jury or in the absence of a regular jury, to hold a criminal charge of tax evasion in all its forms, we have a unconstitutional process flagrant violation of due process laid down in Article 7 of the Charter of Rights of the taxpayer (IRS) which clearly states: "taxpayers have a right to expect that any questions, any review or any action for enforcement bill from the IRS comply with the laws and the IRS will not investigate his affairs any more than necessary; further that the IRS will respect all the rights of due process, including search and seizure protection and provide a due process hearing on the charge where appropriate "

This is because the laws of tax law (IRS) must not be contrary to the provisions of the US Constitution and should not be contrary to the ordering (6th Amendment); "In civil cases, when controversial than twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved," (7th Amendment); and "No one shall be held to answer for a capital crime or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentation to a grand jury indictment," (5th Amendment) of the Charter of Rights Declaration (Bill of Rights) of the US Constitution.

However, in practice, the application of tax law (IRS) violates the Constitution and the authorities who apply illegally, are systematically violated human rights and the Bill of Rights of the Constitution should protect the attorney Stanley Cohen to express and act in line with their political ideology to develop their work.

This means that in this case the US Government vs Stanley Cohen, since the order of detention was issued and subsequently executed the warrant human rights lawyer Stanley Cohen, without prior investigation were violated and where there was the accusation by a grand jury or by a jury that determines Ordinary if there is enough evidence to begin a trial, after a review of the evidence presented to them by a prosecutor in weighing the sufficiency thereof and upon reasonable suspicion, probable cause or prima facie case has been been committed a crime. All this exposure did not exist. For this series of illegalities, is that the IRS negotiators should counsel them SC agrees to plead guilty because they know they are violating the due process and because they know that in a trial of Habeas Corpus, the criminal proceedings that followed against him, and would be declared unconstitutional NULL.

SECOND HYPOTHESIS: THERE crime to pursue tax evasion in all its forms to be punished by imprisonment in jail in this case vs US Government Stanley Cohen, because at the core of the case, the US government is arguing that he be paid a certain sum of money for alleged tax evasion or for whatever reason, that exceeds the amount of twenty dollars, and when there is dispute of this nature, the Sixth Amendment of the Bill of Rights of the Constitution that protects the American citizen and lawyer Stanley Cohen the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, according to the provisions of the (6th Amendment); "In civil cases, when controversial than twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved". According to the above, the payment of taxes to the US government, in case of refusal or the application of any penalty for tax evasion should be handled in the civil courts or administratively, provided that there are administrative tribunals or Civil created prior law passed by the US congress in which the right of trial by jury shall be preserved and should NOT be punished by imprisonment of illegal deprivation of liberty as happens to attorney Stanley Cohen to whom it is filed against, a process criminal tax evasion in violation of due process to be illegal from the outset.
It strengthens the above argument, which is set as mandatory by the US Constitution, the   Section Eight, Article 1. "The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect taxes, taxes, duties and excises, to pay the debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States; but all duties, imposts and excises shall be uniform throughout the United States. "

Article 18. Section Eight. "To make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers, and all other vested by this Constitution in the government of the United States or any department or officer thereof."

IRS UNCONSTITUTIONAL.

In that vein, the authorities of the IRS, are different, the members of the US Congress, who are the only ones with the power to lay and collect taxes, imposts, duties and excises, to pay the debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States; but all duties, imposts and excises shall be uniform throughout the United States. "

Tax laws (IRS) were not issued by the US congress, which is prerequisite for any department or officer of Finance or Treasury apply them legally American citizens or immigrants who are able or fit to pay US taxes. Therefore, the tax law is unconstitutional.
THIRD HYPOTHESIS: In the case that the current tax law (IRS) if it had been issued by the US congress is unconstitutional in all ways because the (IRS) goes against the Constitution established. This is easily demonstrated when we examine the Taxpayer Bill of Rights (IRS). There we find that these laws create an INDEPENDENT POWER Judiciary, the Executive and the Legislature.

INDEPENDENT POWER IRS is formalizing a process independent of all tax collections, formalizes the process of arbitration for appeals; 8.26.6 issued their own laws "of the IRS Manual"; 35.5.5 "from Internal Revenue Service Manual"; and even the Restructuring and Reform Act of 1998 (RRA, for its acronym in English) issued and issued by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), when the only US POWER of having that power is the US Congress.


Invigorates the above hypothesis, the known fact that the department of Appeals is imperative independent of other IRS offices to be able to achieve its mission. In recent years, concerns have been expressed about the structure and processes of the modern department of Appeals and if they met the level of independence that the Restructuring and Reform Act of 1998 (RRA, for its acronym in English) in the level of claims the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), issuing rules that have no constitutional authority. Only the US Congress can. Therefore, there is no doubt that this is NEW oblivious to the Legislature, the Executive Branch and independent Judiciary and therefore the IRS is both unconstitutional POWER.